To: FairOpinion; jveritas; Fedora; Howlin; ravingnutter; piasa; Peach; Grampa Dave; pinz-n-needlez; ...
Big find -- only someone who pretends that the Taliban was not deeply implicated with Al Qaeda or that VP Ramadan was not Saddam's right hand man could possibly doubt the enormous significance of this find. Of course, libs have made a career out of ignoring the obvious, so nothing will sway them now.
32 posted on
06/11/2006 9:08:31 PM PDT by
Enchante
(General Hayden: I've Never Taken a Domestic Flight That Landed in Waziristan!)
To: Enchante
The links that Iraq had with Al Qaeda went back over 10 years. In the 90's, the media was writing about the world's alarm at the relationship between Saddam and Al Qaeda.
Of course, once it became a cause for war, the leftists had to pretend they didn't write what they clearly wrote. LOL
Links here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1327993/posts?page=212#212
53 posted on
06/12/2006 4:02:54 AM PDT by
Peach
(If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
To: Enchante
"Of course, libs have made a career out of ignoring the obvious, so nothing will sway them now."
Yea. There is no way they will bring this stuff forth unless so much pressure is put on them, they have no alternative.
The obviouse would be for the Whitehouse and DoD while in future press conferences to touch on it when the issue of press bias can be intruduced. Clear cut statements, short and sweet to the effect, with much uncovered documents from Saddam's regiem we know for certain he did support terrorist organizations. The add. The documentation is public knowledge now, and there is no reason anyone should have any lingering doubt. Then watch the press reaction.
Bring up again, the Harmony Database. Tony should be able to snap this stuff off with no problem.
65 posted on
06/12/2006 5:06:43 AM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson