The law of unintended consequences strikes once again.
Yes,because they are(Largely)designed to replace the"JEEP"!I would like to know how many of our forces were Killed,Wounded,etc.,etc.,whilst riding in JEEPS in WWII,Korea,Vietnam....I don't think there was any outrage expressed at the time that they were"under-armored"!This is just another avenue for THE LEFT!!!!Tanks(and more lightly armored APCs)are"Armored"vehicles.Hummers are meant to be light,all-purpose transports(Jeeps)!!!!!!!!SHEESHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's what happens when you try to use what is essentially a jeep in a role that calls for light armor. It is the wrong tool for the job.
Don't forget where the complaints were coming from - the RATS. It goes to prove that the uneducated once again open their mouths. It has destroyed the humvees for what they were designed to do.