To: jude24
A slightly more applicable analogy,
Did these politictians scream for censorship when Ward Churchill referred to these ladies' husbands as "little Eichmanns?"
I didn't think so.
30 posted on
06/11/2006 9:42:02 AM PDT by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
My analogy is lifted directly from a Supreme Court case, Fallwell v. Hustler Magazine.
If NJ tries this, they'll get slapped by the Third Circuit pretty hard. I doubt if it'd even make it to the Supreme Court.
35 posted on
06/11/2006 9:45:45 AM PDT by
jude24
("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
To: USNBandit
Did these politictians scream for censorship when Ward Churchill referred to these ladies' husbands as "little Eichmanns?" No, they didn't...and therein lies the stupidity of the "Ann went too far" trolls.
To: USNBandit
Liberals are a snotty, elitist bunch - so long as it's one of "them"...they can say anything they like - even if they don't get accolades for it....NO ONE would dare criticize it.
Ann Coulter shines the light of truth on their little ploys, and it scares the hell out of them. Liberals remind me of my grandchilden who think if their cover their own eyes, no one else can see them. That's their logic behind banning books.
A lot of people have slammed the Jersey Girls...but Ann has routinely hit many raw nerves on the left, and they think they have her over a barrel with this...but they are, as usual, wrong.
Colleges are turning out stupider and stupider people - well indoctrinated leftists - but stupid people all. Common sense seems to have gone away forever.
So, let them ban the book in Jersey...blue states won't read it anyway....and....it's great publicity for Ann.
195 posted on
06/11/2006 11:26:46 AM PDT by
FrankR
(Don't let the bastards wear you down...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson