Capt. Ed Morrissey notes why the story was impossible. He concludes:The logistics of the site appear determinative that the residents of the village could not have seen any of what transpired at the safe house. The sequence of events show that the US had timed their raid for maximum security and efficiency, and that the ground forces of Iraqi and American troops would have acted immediately to secure this very remote site to ensure no one escaped. The AP apparently didn't read the Reuters description of the attack site before publishing this uncorroborated account of a supposed atrocity.
Is the AP now in the business of reporting anything anyone says about any event without doing some rudimentary investigation first? We call that gossip, not news, and we expect better than a National Enquirer standard at the AP.
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/007178.php
"we expect better than a National Enquirer standard at the AP. "
Why?
A.P. = Anon Press, nearly every article I see in our local paper from AP does not give the authors name.
Easy to be a biased liar in public when your identity remains unknown.