Replies

Anyone wanting to find a reason to impeach Bush? Look at "attempt" to destroy our sovereingty (sp). Course you'd have to impeach/imprison a hellva lot of other politicians too.

Anyone wanting to find a reason to impeach Bush? Look at "attempt" to destroy our sovereingty (sp).

So should Bush be impeached?

This is for anyone who can answer: Does anyone know how I can find the article where President Bush said that the Constitution was just a @#%&* piece of paper? I saw this mentioned here, but I didn't get a chance to read the piece. Thanks

I believe we're seeing a confluence of interests that has been brewing for decades. The interests of the one-world-government socialists and those of the globalists/corporatists have merged; one driven by ideology, the other by profits.

Corporatism is not conservatism when it becomes willing to sell out our sovereignty, to extinguish American exceptionalism, for the sake of the global organization of markets.

Divisiveness and polarization are decried by most, but we will need more of both to make clear to authentic Americans the gravity of the moment, to throw into clear black and white relief the choice we face. Thus all we do and write at FR, the blogs and in our political action must be aimed at maximizing polarization. The choice must be made clear; This situation must be brought to a head.

Impeach Bush, if you can, but that alone won't be enough. The battle will have to be fought initially in the House of Representatives. All contributions to the Republican party, national, state and local, have to stop. Instead we must identify real conservative candidates and support them directly with money. There is no alternative; voting third party or sitting out elections is foolish. We have to remake the Republican party. Every election must be an electoral bloodbath.

To Bushbots who squeal and bleat about the things Bush has done correctly, the response to 9/11, the appointment of conservative judges, etc., we can only say, yes, he did the right thing, that is expected; but we expect him to do the right thing in all cases -- doing the right thing in one case doesn't somehow make up for not doing the right thing elsewhere. And his stance on this issue is not some kind of mistake. It is premeditated