Amazingly stupid. The damage Leftist can do with Judicial appointments alone in 4 years would totally undo any gains Conservatives have made for the last 20 years. A large number of Reagan Judges are going to be retiring. 7 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices were born in the 1930s or 1920s. So the pseudo Conservative will throw a childish temper tantrum because they are not getting ONLY 100% of ONLY what they want, and thus dump all over everything they supposedly believe in away. Utterly stupid and childish behavior by petulant immature fools.
But then considering how the pseudos Conservatives only post 100% of the time ranting and raving at their own side, I think it is pretty clear they were never Conservatives but Deaniac "Virtual Campaigners" lying to us about their true agenda.
Liberal judicial appointments and the elimination of the 2nd Amendment will be the result of any democrat control...not to mention bizarre "global warming legislation".....
"Utterly stupid and childish behavior by petulant immature fools"
So Johnnie, if these folks are pseudo-conservatives, perhaps you could tell us who are the REAL conservatives in your illustrious opinion?
I agree with your sentiments, and historically, so did Goldwater, Reagan and Gingrich in the past.
And, instead of leaving the GOP to the RINOS it is up to Conservatives to go back to our political study books and our political principles, fight even harder than we have for a decade at the grass roots (House of Representatives) and continue to build the constituencies and the candidates for continued Conservative rewnewal IN THE GOP.
However, that does not mean that Conservatives cannot also, and do not also need, to consider priorities and looking at just what are the essentials. Sometimes, if "social" and "libertarian" Conservatives would look beyond a particular result they want to the underlying governance problem that is preventing that result they would find themselves in agreement more often. For instance, the problem with "gay" marriage is totally the courts. So instead of writing a "social conservative" definition of marriage to be imposed by a federal constitutional amendment, write a totally conservative federal amendment that sets the standard for who can define marriage, setting the state legislatures and no one else, and not a court, federal or state as the only power for defining marriage. Simply give conservatives in the states what they need - keep the courts out of it. I think that amendment would have passed.