Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FerdieMurphy
The Republican Party in its essentials has been taken over by a mutation. Wikipedia describes this line of thought as "Neo" or "New Wave" conservatism...it is contrary to many basic "Paleocon" principles.

"Paleocons" believe in the principles of limited government, limited spending and borrowing, limited intervention into citizens' lives, and states' rights. They also believe in restraint of foreign entanglement, a strong national defense and traditional family values.

"Neocons" believe in an agressive foreign policy, empiric intervention in other nations to spread democracy, and global economic-trade policies. Weak on domestic policies, they lack emphasis on national issues. Their vision includes motivating our nation towards what I believe Pres. Bush's father referred to as the "New World Order." Include growth of government and overspending too.

Here I would add:
Neocons, because many came from the Democrat party, spend on domestic programs like there was no tomorrow.
We welcomed them at the time because they were strong Anti-Communists.

As to the Spending: Apparently this is why GWB finds it so simpatico to deal with Teddy and the rest ot the demz on NCLB, Medicare drugs Part D, $$$ billions for Katrina, tens of millions of new Democrat illegal aliens, etc. etc. etc.

For several years many Traditional, Conservative (Paleo is what the Neocons named us) Republicans believed/prayed that Bush was really a conservative. Now many of us know the truth.

This does not mean that I/we will leave the Republican Party, or that we will not fight for Bush when he is right, or when others attack him.
It means that I, for one, will fight for OUR country, the Republican Party, AND our president with my eyes wide open.
Just remember, I am furious about certain errors being made, and will stand and fight for what I believe is right.

106 posted on 06/10/2006 8:06:26 AM PDT by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist, cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: meema

Your #106 is excellent.


116 posted on 06/10/2006 8:14:27 AM PDT by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: meema
This does not mean that I/we will leave the Republican Party, or that we will not fight for Bush when he is right, or when others attack him. It means that I, for one, will fight for OUR country, the Republican Party, AND our president with my eyes wide open.

Bump.

Just remember, I am furious about certain errors being made, and will stand and fight for what I believe is right.

Ditto.

120 posted on 06/10/2006 8:18:07 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: meema
Here I would add: Neocons, because many came from the Democrat party, spend on domestic programs like there was no tomorrow. We welcomed them at the time because they were strong Anti-Communists.

You are close.

I would add however that since the collapse of communism and by extension socialism they no longer yearn for socialist solutions with the same fervor that their forebears did. e.g. FDR, Truman etc.

They now know that free markets work and controlled ones do not. And hence are required in order to support their globalist ambitions.

161 posted on 06/10/2006 10:11:40 AM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("fake but accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson