To: COEXERJ145
Bush's fault for not signing Kyoto.Kyoto was during the Clinton years. My understanding is he signed it, but never had it before the Senate. In other words his signature was worth nada, the same as Bush not signing it.
19 posted on
06/09/2006 4:49:59 PM PDT by
mountn man
(Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.)
To: mountn man
You know that and I know that but the lefties are to stupid to realize it.
20 posted on
06/09/2006 4:51:30 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(Every person has a photographic memory... but some don't have their flash card installed.)
To: mountn man
My understanding is he signed it, but never had it before the Senate. Clinton didn't even sign it, he had AlGore do it for him. As I recall, he presented either the treaty itself or asked the Senate for a resolution about the treaty. Whichever, it was overwhelmingly defeated, by something like 90 votes.
21 posted on
06/09/2006 5:29:02 PM PDT by
jimtorr
To: mountn man
The senate rejected debate on that piece of crap by a vote of 95 to 0 in 1997 or 1998, IIRC.
28 posted on
06/10/2006 2:46:19 PM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson