Coulter is not psychotic, true. But she is neurotic.
Whatever truth she may write or say gets lost in the way she says it.
She's like the guy in the stands at a kid's baseball game who says "Hey, look at the fat kid. He can't hit."
Everybody knows the fat kid can't hit, but they're embarrassed, not at the fat kid, but at the jerk in the stands.
Coulter has a schtick, Savage has a schtick, and they both are comfortable in their respective grooves, and successful in their niche markets - as entertainers, not as seers. Getting overly in a wad about them, I consider a bit of acting like the fall guy. If one does not like their act, if one is not entertained, turn the channel. That is what I do. Savage comes on after Hugh Hewitt in my media market, often when I am driving home. I just turn the channel at 6 pm sharp, either to NPR, Al Rantel, or if in the a naughty mood, to John and Ken for an anti illegal rant session.
I respect your opinion, but it's just that.
I find her to be very funny at times. Her reply to Hillary the other day is something ONLY she would say and it's something that needed to be said to that commie bitch.
She is by no means the best pundit or writer or spokesman on the conservative side. Far from it. But she just in the last days amplified the dems "sacred cow/human shield" strategy for all the world to see and understand. And on top of it she is laughing all the way to the bank.
And on top of that, this Bratwurster chick deserves all the scorn and ridicule that M. Moore and Cindy Sheehan do.
Nice ad hominem there, Mr. Rational.
Are you still deeply troubled when Coulter calls the communist swine what they, in fact, are?