1 posted on
06/09/2006 11:09:11 AM PDT by
AZLiberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: AZLiberty; All
2 posted on
06/09/2006 11:10:30 AM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Politicans Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For the Same Reason!)
To: AZLiberty
Abu Musab al Zarkawi was responsible for despicable attacks that claimed the lives of too many Iraqis and Americans.
So Hil thinks he killed too many Iraqis and Americans? That implies an acceptable level of deaths she wouldn't object to.
3 posted on
06/09/2006 11:11:56 AM PDT by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: AZLiberty
Guess she won't be getting his check anytime soon..
4 posted on
06/09/2006 11:12:11 AM PDT by
Wombat101
(Islam: Turning everything it touches to Shi'ite since 632 AD...)
To: AZLiberty
"As a leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al Zarkawi was responsible for despicable attacks that claimed the lives of too many Iraqis and Americans." Hillary, just how many is too many?
5 posted on
06/09/2006 11:12:41 AM PDT by
jigsaw
(God Bless Our Troops. Our thanks to each and every one of you!)
To: AZLiberty
It was also a bit surprising that she didn't react as many liberals have
Acting...
6 posted on
06/09/2006 11:12:44 AM PDT by
Dallas59
To: AZLiberty
i hope poopy-licker's head just exploded
7 posted on
06/09/2006 11:14:11 AM PDT by
InvisibleChurch
(No.... wire .... hangers!)
To: AZLiberty
While it figures that Hillary would insert herself into this story, it is true that she and her family were there and seemed visibly moved. It was also a bit surprising that she didn't react as many liberals have, which is by briefly saying Zarkawi's death is a good thing and then quickly moving on to criticize the administration. Way to show some restraint, Hill. Why don't you send her some flowers
8 posted on
06/09/2006 11:14:17 AM PDT by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: AZLiberty
Hillary says: "Zarkawi was responsible for despicable attacks that claimed the lives of too many Iraqis and Americans. Too many? Well then.... what exactly is the acceptable number to kill?
9 posted on
06/09/2006 11:14:41 AM PDT by
avacado
To: AZLiberty
10 posted on
06/09/2006 11:14:51 AM PDT by
cvq3842
To: AZLiberty
[Hillary weighs in] At about 190...
11 posted on
06/09/2006 11:16:16 AM PDT by
Lunatic Fringe
(Man Law: You Poke It, You Own It)
To: AZLiberty
Well she's doubling down on her (for a lefty) hawkish stance. I guess there's no turning back for her. She won't win the nomination.
12 posted on
06/09/2006 11:16:19 AM PDT by
Huck
(Hey look, I'm still here.)
To: AZLiberty
"It was also a bit surprising that she didn't react as many liberals have,"
ohhhh give her time.
To: AZLiberty
15 posted on
06/09/2006 11:16:28 AM PDT by
The_Republican
(So Dark The Con of Man)
To: AZLiberty
Everybody who thinks that this is a classic, insincere, cynically-opportunistic maneuver by Her Hillary-ness, please raise your e-hand.
This "Senator" couldn't care less; the only thing that she cares about is power.
16 posted on
06/09/2006 11:18:29 AM PDT by
kromike
To: AZLiberty
Hillary weighs in?
Snicker, snicker.
17 posted on
06/09/2006 11:20:11 AM PDT by
HIDEK6
To: AZLiberty
Abu Musab al Zarkawi was responsible for despicable attacks that claimed the lives of too many Iraqis and AmericansWhat should be a more appropriate number of lives? Seems once again she didn't think first.
Hill has seen the way the wind is blowing. She's setting her sights for '08. Next she'll claim to be for securing the borders.
18 posted on
06/09/2006 11:21:45 AM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: AZLiberty
Hillary Hawk: "Zarqawi better be glad that the military got him before I did."
20 posted on
06/09/2006 11:26:28 AM PDT by
Niteranger68
(Ninguna tarjeta verde. Ningún Inglés. Ningún servicio.)
To: AZLiberty
This is not surprising at all. Why is anyone surprised? The Senator's every move for years has been plotted on a course towards winning both the DNC nomination and the Presidency.
She will insert her comment into every major positive accomplishment on the war from here on out. She needs to look hawkish to win. And she'll crush any Dem that dares to chide her for it.
21 posted on
06/09/2006 11:26:36 AM PDT by
rjp2005
To: AZLiberty
It is frightening that she is one of the few dems that I even understand anymore. She ain't fooling me, but I at least know what she is saying and where she is coming from(most times).
22 posted on
06/09/2006 11:32:21 AM PDT by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: AZLiberty
This woman is so insincere that it took her 24 hours to decide what she should say about a major US victory in the war against Islamofascism. And even then she allowed the "too many" faux pas into her statement.
If she hadn't been married to Boy Clinton, she'd still be an extreme left-wing lawyer in some scandal-ridden law firm somewhere, and few of us would ever have heard of her. By no measure is she of presidential caliber.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson