Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question Liberal Authority
How about the yearS long orgasms of "you can't even find Zarquawi"
51 posted on 06/08/2006 10:47:01 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: pissant
"[Zarqawi's] death does not alter the fact that our brave men and women in uniform are fighting a war of choice in which the President sent our troops into harm's way without a plan for victory and without leveling with the American people,"

She says that like this is a bad thing.

First, she calls it a war of choice. Nevermind the fact that libs love choice. Implicit in that phrase is that if Dems were in charge, they would have made a different choice, and that Zarqawi, the most active terrorist since 9/11 would be alive and well, training recruits and planning operations.

Then she says Bush had no "plan for victory". Wasn't Bush's plan to kill terrorists in Iraq before they kill us in the USA? Seems like he might have had some success in that department.

Then she says Bush didn't "level with the American people". He's been saying basically since September 12 that he's going to smoke em out and bring em to justice. It seems like he's making good on that promise as well.

So, Ms Speaker, tell us. What would have been your choice - keep Saddam in power, or keep him free? What was your plan for victory in the War On Terror? What is it now? Please name three occasions on which you have ever leveled with the American people in your entire life.
68 posted on 06/08/2006 10:59:37 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Now that Zarqawi is dead, who will the Democrats nominate in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson