[Rummyfan]

The five, who call themselves the September 11th Advocates, issued a 13-paragraph statement Tuesday in which they call Coulter's comments slanderous.

So let them sue!

[lawdude]

The first thing these people did was demand the government compensate them in with millions of $$ of TAXPAYER money for their "LOSS?". When my dad died, my mother got a very small SSI check.

[Redleg Duke]

Only in the Socialist Peoples Republic of New Jersey is the truth "slanderous".

[cbkaty]

The five, who call themselves the September 11th Advocates, issued a 13-paragraph statement Tuesday in which they call Coulter's comments slanderous.

Wouldn't that be libel...not slander....? At any rate these ladies had already injected themselves into the public forum....took their swing and got slugged....

[Lancey Howard]

That's what I say - - the scumbag "Jersey Girls" should sue. Let's go to trial and see how happy all of these marriages were. Let's go to trial and see why these sick scumbags cheered on the laughingstock "9/11 Commission" and firmly entered the political arena by publicly endorsing John Kerry. "Slander", huh? That's a legal term and the scumbag "Jersey Girls" better be prepared to back it up.

[Flash Bazbeaux]

"So let them sue!"

They won't, of course, as they have no case. Coulter's speech is protected speech. The Jersey Girls have chosen to make themselves public political figures. Coulter's statement was on a political topic. No way this is actionable under New York Times v. Sullivan.