Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DustyMoment

I disagree, it does not mock the court, it mocks the attorneys, showing how childish they are.

Porsonally, I'd ratyher attorneys have to settle it with their left wrists bound together, and a knife in the right hand. Then they'd really earn what they charge.


12 posted on 06/08/2006 4:11:59 AM PDT by Toby06 (True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Toby06
I disagree, it does not mock the court, it mocks the attorneys, showing how childish they are.

Judges have options. They can hear a case, or refuse to hear a case. If the case is stupid at its core, they simply have to refuse to hear it.

But, "punishing" the attorneys who filed the case the judge decided to hear makes a mockery of the court system. Until we have a "loser pays" system, when judges decide to hear stupid cases, it isn't the attorney's fault - it's the idiot judge who decided to hear the case.
14 posted on 06/08/2006 4:41:53 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Toby06
Personally, I'd rather attorneys have to settle it with their left wrists bound together, and a knife in the right hand. Then they'd really earn what they charge.

Thunder dome style. Two go in, one comes out.

19 posted on 06/08/2006 6:02:49 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson