To: DustyMoment
I disagree, it does not mock the court, it mocks the attorneys, showing how childish they are.
Porsonally, I'd ratyher attorneys have to settle it with their left wrists bound together, and a knife in the right hand. Then they'd really earn what they charge.
12 posted on
06/08/2006 4:11:59 AM PDT by
Toby06
(True conservatives vote based on their values, not for parties.)
To: Toby06
I disagree, it does not mock the court, it mocks the attorneys, showing how childish they are.
Judges have options. They can hear a case, or refuse to hear a case. If the case is stupid at its core, they simply have to refuse to hear it.
But, "punishing" the attorneys who filed the case the judge decided to hear makes a mockery of the court system. Until we have a "loser pays" system, when judges decide to hear stupid cases, it isn't the attorney's fault - it's the idiot judge who decided to hear the case.
14 posted on
06/08/2006 4:41:53 AM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Toby06
Personally, I'd rather attorneys have to settle it with their left wrists bound together, and a knife in the right hand. Then they'd really earn what they charge. Thunder dome style. Two go in, one comes out.
19 posted on
06/08/2006 6:02:49 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson