Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin

The Mrs. said that the trucking provisions weren't in the treaty. They were binding regulations added later. That's what I mixed up...and that's why she gets paid to be the journalist, and I don't...


49 posted on 06/07/2006 6:09:26 PM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: warchild9

The link in my above reply says that the provisions were in NAFTA.


50 posted on 06/07/2006 6:18:17 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: warchild9; Ben Ficklin

I think everyone might be correct here. The trucking provisions are not in the text of the treaty itself, but the treaty might have one or more codicils that specifically address the subject. So for someone like me, that means it's not in the treaty, but for someone like a journalist, it's not worth the time or effort to explain the difference.


52 posted on 06/07/2006 6:22:06 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson