Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservative physics
Presumably you aren't allowed to use the 'withdrawl method' either, since this interferes with a 'natural process' (whatever that really means).
But it's OK to use the rhythm method because, while you *are* circumventing a 'natural process', you're doing it in a subtle way, subtle enough to fool God, who evidently isn't very clever.

Frankly, the spinning, rationalizations and justifications here would do Clinton proud.

23 posted on 06/07/2006 11:29:36 AM PDT by blowfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: blowfish
But it's OK to use the rhythm method because, while you *are* circumventing a 'natural process', you're doing it in a subtle way, subtle enough to fool God, who evidently isn't very clever.

But you're not circumventing anything with the rhythm method. The natural process IS a period of infertility. And as anyone whose tried it can tell you, I wouldn't place any large bets against conception occuring anyhow. The process isn't fool proof by any stretch, so couples are well aware that conception is still a reasonable possibility. Also, if the rhythm method was as reliable as you seem to think it is, no one would bother with condoms, end of story.

Frankly, the spinning, rationalizations and justifications here would do Clinton proud.

Touched a nerve? Sheesh. There's no law saying you have to be a Catholic. If you can come up with an argument that trumps 2000 years of Catholic theology, then go for it.

25 posted on 06/07/2006 12:57:21 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson