I aplogize if that's the way I came off.
I went out of my way to state that I think the warriors are a neccesary part of the conservative movement. I should have emphasised that more.
My main point was to explain to hosepipe why I choose not to join the "fight" for its own sake. Also, an explaination was in order for by agreement with sinkspur, with whom I disagree vehemently many times (especially immigration).
I will say, without apology, that our side (and I mean conservative, not Republican) has a disproportionate number of attack dogs (which, once again, I think are neccessary). We need a few more good cops to complement the bad cops. I'm waiting for the next Reagan to appear. (Would he EVER say anything like Coulter? If not, did that make him a PC wimp?)
Again, sorry I came off as attacking fellow conservatives, I was anticipating the Rino, Wimp, PC attack that would come my way if I criticized Coulter's way of doing things. It was wrong of me to pre-emptively strike.
That is why he (sinkspur) opposes Coulter and Malkin (and myself), because he is PRO-illegal.
Smart .. Would'd happened too..
Coulter says what most don't have the horsepower to say but would..
In Not not nearly so elegant a way.. Creative disgust..