Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SandRat
The Problem with Fozzie, the UDF is what I will call the B-17 problem.

It sounds like a B-17 when it flies over.

That may have been acceptable in 1944, but in 2006, no way.

UDF's are deader than than dead. They looked so good on paper....

19 posted on 06/06/2006 7:49:30 PM PDT by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: UNGN

Yes, UDF (Un-Ducted Fan) was another acronym for them as well.


26 posted on 06/06/2006 8:51:40 PM PDT by Jotmo ("Voon", said the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: UNGN
I think people forget that the propfan designs from the 1970's and 1980's were eight-bladed units which required fast spin rates for decent thrust from the engine. That had two problems: 1) it generated a lot of noise and 2) there was the danger of what happens if a fan blade breaks.

However, thanks to better gearbox designs since then (which allow the switch to ten-bladed propfans), this will allow for slower fan speeds with far less noise and less danger in case of blade failure. The Fozzie concept could actually work for an airline like Southwest Airlines flying routes under 900 nautical miles in length, where cruise speed performance is less critical. For example, this plane would be perfect for Southwest's intra-California routes and routes between California and Nevada/Arizona; another place such a plane would be useful is intra-Texas routes.

28 posted on 06/06/2006 8:58:46 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson