Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Carlsbad attorney critical of leaks in Marine probe-bastards who leaked should be hung
NC Times ^ | 6-6-06

Posted on 06/06/2006 4:45:00 PM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: SJackson
The House and Senate Armed Services committees are scheduled to conduct hearings into the incidents later this month.

They should bar the Murtha's of the world from this hearing, since they have already rendered their verdict!

http://Vets4Irey.com

21 posted on 06/06/2006 5:01:58 PM PDT by W04Man (Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! NOW.... PLEASE STAY THE COURSE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Hearings, and leaks, lesson the chance of justice being done.

Well, there are leaks around criminal civilian cases here all the time (i.e., the Duke lacrosse players) and justice seems to prevail in spite of them.

22 posted on 06/06/2006 5:02:24 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: saganite
That's a plain spoken attorney!

Needs grammer lessons. Should be hanged.

23 posted on 06/06/2006 5:03:28 PM PDT by leadhead (It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I agree too. Our military is the finest there is!!!!!!


24 posted on 06/06/2006 5:03:32 PM PDT by NordP (GWB/Reagan Republican --- JACK BAUER PATRIOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Well..then, there is precedent for overturning convictions...and we need to remind any and all about that.

I have seen Ollie on TV several times since the Haditha thing blew up last week...and he has been adamant about not trying this case in the media...and he should know.


25 posted on 06/06/2006 5:04:33 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Okay...are you saying they are leaking to soften the blow on THIS case, like you said they are trying to do on the Haditha case??

Yes. I wouldn't use "soften the blow," but it does seem to take some of the edge off when, and if, charges come down.

Contrast this with the way the Pentagon acted as if it was blind-sided by Abu Ghraib.

26 posted on 06/06/2006 5:06:01 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It seems inappropriate for Congress to hold hearings until the charges have been dealt with.

I have searched in vain in the Constitution for any provision which gives Congress investigative authority, or the authority to issue subpoenas, hold people in contempt of Congress, and related actions. Investigations (Executive Branch), subpoenas and holding people in contempt (Judicial Branch) appear to be gross violations by the Legislative Branch of the separation of powers.

Congress claims it needs to conduct oversight since it passes budget bills. Well, oversight is one thing, but Congress routinely (and shockingly without question) issues subpoenas to private citizens, conducts investigations into the affairs of private citizens, and holds people in contempt if they do not comply with Congressional investigations.

One might accept that, although it is not so stated in the Constitution, Congress does need to conduct budgetary oversight. But Congressional hearings should be limited in scope solely to such matters.

27 posted on 06/06/2006 5:08:23 PM PDT by Wolfstar (So tired of the straight line, and everywhere you turn, There's vultures and thieves at your back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Perhaps....but, I don't like leaks at all...and I think this just stirs up NEW stories from Iraq, that all of a sudden ANOTHER case of our military massacreing civilians is "found"...

Plus, as has been said many times on the Haditha threads...in that culture, it is a good thing to be a liar...so, I don't know how our military can actually KNOW when/if to believe anyone that is supposedly a "witness".


28 posted on 06/06/2006 5:10:50 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

In reference to your thread- some more interesting bits and pieces..


29 posted on 06/06/2006 5:10:59 PM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Incorrect grammar. Pictures are hung, people are hanged. There is an exception, however:

"They said you was hung!"

"They was right!"

30 posted on 06/06/2006 5:14:03 PM PDT by ZOOKER ( <== I'm with Stupid...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
What if the Pentagon is directing the leaking?

Do you have a theory? Please share.

31 posted on 06/06/2006 5:15:34 PM PDT by TankerKC (¿José puede usted ver?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
I have seen Ollie on TV several times since the Haditha thing blew up last week...and he has been adamant about not trying this case in the media...and he should know.

Are you familiar with the Son Thang incident in Vietnam which North became intimately involved with?

If not, I'll post a couple links tomorrow.

The Solis view, legitimate, is that war crimes were committed and the two final acquittals were nullifications. Brought about by the additional testimony brought into the case by North. Personally, I think there is a lot of room for doubt, but unfortunately while the Solis book is widely acclaimed, as it should be, the opposing view comes across only in Randy Herrod's (an acquitted defendent) book Blue's Bastards, Blue being North, and a few articles that I doubt you can find on the internet.

The incident is hauntingly similar to Hadithah, accusations of murder of civilians in the face of enemy fire, in the Son Thang case not confirmed till later. One of the lessons, use a civilian lawyer.

Did Military Justice Fail or Prevail?

32 posted on 06/06/2006 5:15:57 PM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's beyond me why any military attorneys or otherwise would want to leak a damn squeak to the L/MSM on anything.
Maybe it is high time some of these type folks should be sent to special training to learn how to use an M16,M4, then assinged temporary duty walking the streets of Iraq with soldiers or Marines doing SASO patrols.
Perhaps their sad asses would come around and start acting a bit like soldiers and Marines.
33 posted on 06/06/2006 5:19:37 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Finally! A lawyer I like! I'd like to see everyone in the "media" hung in public also. I'm sorry, we're dealing with DemocRAT girlymen here. I meant hanged in public.


34 posted on 06/06/2006 5:21:11 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (DemocRATS! America's Lynch Mob.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
Do you have a theory? Please share.

I did. The military is releasing, in dribs and drabs, some very unpleasant details of these incidents in an effort to defuse the final reports.

35 posted on 06/06/2006 5:21:15 PM PDT by sinkspur ( Don Cheech. Vito Corleone would like to meet you......Vito Corleone.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Hillary is on the armed services committee along with Kennedy. There's a clue in there someplace.


36 posted on 06/06/2006 5:23:33 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"The bastards who leaked the information should be hung in a public square"

Might as well add SP Fitz to the attractions.

37 posted on 06/06/2006 5:23:38 PM PDT by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

LOL. It'd be a real hootenanny.


38 posted on 06/06/2006 5:25:00 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: W04Man
Ahhhhhhhh....I knew it. Hillary and Kennedy are on that committee. I'm sure all these leaks are "directed" by Hillary. She sits in the background....letting her boot lickers do the leaking.

And these Dems seek to make one of their own (Hillary) Commander in Chief. God help us!!

39 posted on 06/06/2006 5:27:42 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I'll ditto your Post No. 5. Thanks for your support of our Marines!


40 posted on 06/06/2006 5:54:23 PM PDT by maxwellp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson