Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
In effect what you are doing by passing such an Amendment is limiting the states to handle their internal affairs as they see fit.

Sorry, but 3/4s of the states have to assent to an amendment. So it is a willful agreement between the states and the fedgov, unlike most regular federal legislation which I doubt the author has a problem with.

44 posted on 06/06/2006 8:02:34 AM PDT by dirtboy (When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Sorry, but 3/4s of the states have to assent to an amendment. So it is a willful agreement between the states and the fedgov, unlike most regular federal legislation which I doubt the author has a problem with.

Nope still takes power away from the states. What if 1/4 of the states don't agree with it? By your argument they will be required by federal mandate to accept the standard. Let's take it past marriage, let's put up something you don't like whose power to control or maintain originally fell under the power of the states. Will you again be so ardent to subvert the ideals of federalism then?

92 posted on 06/06/2006 11:32:55 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson