Posted on 06/06/2006 5:13:56 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Missed the program but thrilled to see Drudge has a link to the video up on his site.
"Perhaps you should look it up."
Her decisions are at least "eccentric", ergo a ditz.
On her game today. Looked better (healthier) than she did over the winter.
LOL - I am not a liberal and I am not for open borders : )
If you click through to the underlying link at the link you provided, you'll see that the author of the original article about Lauer in Iraq was . . . me!
go to Drudge and follow the link.
Thanks.
It's a small world after all ; )
If it makes you feel better to call me cowardly, go for it.
No, you're just too lazy to read, or too stupid to understand what you read.
All I've asked is for you to answer for the blatant untruth you told in post 237 when you said: "The first chapter is online at townhall.com. In it, she described the American Eagle as vermin and compared it to a rat. She's got a heck of a nerve calling other people unpatriotic."
It's clearly explained in post 289. Would you like me to make it even simpler? I guess I'd better; if you're a Coulter fan, you probably can't read without moving your lips.
Coulter said that eeeevil greens won't let us use DDT because DNA might hurt birds. This refers to the bald eagle, which was the bird most conspicuously poisoned by DDT, and whose decline was in large part motivation for the ban. Coulter then said birds are like rats, you couldn't get rid of them if you tried. Which birds? Why, the birds adversely affected by DDT - in other words, the bald eagle. She then said "The various weeds and vermin liberals are always trying to save are no more distinguishable than individual styles of rap music". So, since an eagle isn't a weed, and since it is one of the specific species we were trying to save with the DDT ban, it can only mean it is vermin, according to Coulter.
I can't make it any simpler. On the other hand, I'm used to dealing with college students, not grade-school dropouts.
How impressive you think you are. Have fun in your Hate Ann cult.
Oh, yes...and I thrive on insults from liars.
How pathetic, to badger someone for an explanation, and then slink away.
Pure stretch, words in mouth, not disclosed, etc.
An honest person might have said "I support banning DDT to save bald eagles, and think Ann is wrong to prefer saving human beings in Africa" - or that there are other ways to do the latter. But pretending that supporting DDT is unpatriotic is just too ridiculous to be taken seriously. It is indeed Ann's church of liberalism, Silent Spring as gospel, diagnosis.
Is it internet night at the group home, or something?
I got your lying goat Professor, and I'm hanging it on my trophy wall.
If ever anyone is in doubt of your veracity, I have a juicy link for them.
But never forget there is redemption in confession.
Still at it, JasonC? Want to revisit our previous conversation about DDT, where you blamed greens for events that happened years before DDT was banned?
But pretending that supporting DDT is unpatriotic is just too ridiculous to be taken seriously.
Coulteresque, you might even say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.