For a bit there, I thought you were apologizing for the anti-evolution crowd. But you seem to be regretting one side.
And, no, I neither know nor care what your side of the debate is, I am not directing comment toward your position or your self; only toward the inevitable unraveling of anything FR is supposed to represent when crevo/evo links appear.
There's an issue about what goes into science classes. I'm always dismayed that some discount science as an arbiter of this content. There's another question about what the role of conservatism is in this issue.
Evolution is observable, apparently sometimes reversible, and certainly logical.
Excellent! And the only place I want it is in science class. Nobody has to preach it in their church.
It's the God versus convenient 'soup' thing that can't be proved, screws up the voltage, and [as I understand it] was only part of Darwin's contribution to evolution by osmosis from other contemporary and subsequent commentators.
Darwin's published works do not speculate on the origin of life.