Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG

I am not advocating people vote for Casey over Santorum. IN fact for some reason Freepers don't like Santorum on here it appears. I have never understood why. Yes he will vote for the Dem House Leadership so that is a problem. However if Casey's convictions are like his dads that is generally a good thing for the Pro life movement. At least it shows an opening there that can be exploited. Thats all I am saying


309 posted on 06/05/2006 10:19:03 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: catholicfreeper

It's simple. Santorum had the opportunity to remain neutral in the last primary which Spectre won over a conservative opponent. He supported the Arch-RINO Spectre who squeaked out a victory and has been a pain-in-the-rectum ever since.


320 posted on 06/05/2006 10:29:43 PM PDT by rock58seg (A minority of Republican RINO's are making a majority of Republicans look like fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

To: catholicfreeper

And all I am saying is this: Replacing the truly pro-life Santorum with the nominally-prolife-but-will-support-Schumer Casey will be a setback for the prolife cause, no ifs, ands, or buts. Casey already waffled on whether he'd support conservative judges.


391 posted on 06/06/2006 5:16:08 AM PDT by WOSG (Do your duty, be a patriot, support our Troops - VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson