Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.J. Considers Requiring Quick-Extinguishing Cigarettes
WNBC Television ^ | 6/5/06 | Puppage

Posted on 06/05/2006 1:06:03 PM PDT by Puppage

TRENTON, N.J. -- New Jersey would become one of a handful of states to require that cigarettes sold in state have extra fire protections built in, under a measure being considered in the Legislature.

The proposal -- modeled after similar laws in New York, Vermont, California, Illinois and a newly enacted statute in New Hampshire -- is built on the premise that such cigarettes are less likely to cause fires if left unattended by smokers. The proposal is scheduled to be heard by an Assembly on June 12.

"This is good legislation, in my opinion," said Assemblyman Jack Conners, a Burlington Democrat who is co-sponsoring the bill. "It's going to save lives. In talking to my firemen friends, it isn't just the careless smoker who gets burned or dies, it's family members and firemen who can die in these fires."

The Coalition for Fire-Safe Cigarettes estimates that 800 people die in fires started by careless smoking each year and argues on its Web site that requiring safer cigarettes would save countless lives and property. In New Jersey, the Division of Fire Safety attributed 881 residential fires and five fatalities to blazes started by cigarettes in 2005.

Quick-extinguishing cigarettes are made with paper that contains bands to slow burning tobacco. If left unattended, the burning tobacco will reach a band and go out.

RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co., the North Carolina-based manufacturer of such brands as Camel, Winston and Kool, has been fighting the legislation in states that propose it.

"We agree with the goal of reducing fires by careless handling of cigarettes," company spokesman David Howard said Monday. "This kind of legislation does absolutely nothing to address that."

He said calling such cigarettes "fire-safe" presents smokers with a false sense of security since even the quick-extinguishing variety burn and can start fires if mishandled.

Assemblyman Herb Conaway, another Burlington County Democrat who is co-sponsoring the bill, said the legislation should be enacted federally, but the powerful tobacco lobby has kept it from being considered on a national level.

Conaway said the legislation on the table in New Jersey represents a progression in safety standards, just like changes in fire resistance made mattresses and upholstery products safer.

Tony Correia, director of the Burlington Township Fire Department, has no trouble throwing his support behind the state measure in absence of a federal cigarette safety law. He remembers the 2004 fire that took the life of a colleague, New Brunswick Deputy Fire Chief James D'Heron, and three recent fires in Burlington County that authorities attribute to careless smoking.

"Is this going to stop every instance of these fires? No," said Conner. "But this is going to prevent a lot of them."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: dimwitdems; govwatch; libertarians; nannystate; newjersey; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 06/05/2006 1:06:06 PM PDT by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Assemblyman Jack Conners, a Burlington Democrat

Now why did I know that before I clicked the link? Hmmmmm.

2 posted on 06/05/2006 1:08:55 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Nanny Staters are Ameba's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

3 posted on 06/05/2006 1:09:58 PM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Cigars are self-extinguishing because they have no additives of the kind in cigarettes which encourage burning . Remove the additives and cigarettes will be self-extinguishing, too.
4 posted on 06/05/2006 1:10:01 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

But according to Meathead, this is going to cost tax dollars.


5 posted on 06/05/2006 1:10:49 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308
"We agree with the goal of reducing fires by careless handling of cigarettes," company spokesman David Howard said Monday. "This kind of legislation does absolutely nothing to address that."

That matters not. We're dealing with FEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELINGS, here.

6 posted on 06/05/2006 1:11:04 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion; Diana in Wisconsin

ping


7 posted on 06/05/2006 1:11:57 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Believe it or not, the place where I went to high school in 1960 would permit cigar smoking, pipe smoking, and tobacco chewing, but not cigarette smoking for this very reason.

Needless to say, there was a thriving undergound cigarette trade.

8 posted on 06/05/2006 1:12:31 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
These Pols have waaaaaay too much time on their hands.

Ya think they could decide which fate is worse for a smoker
dieing in a house fire or
dieing from emphysema/heart disease

9 posted on 06/05/2006 1:13:00 PM PDT by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Why not require candles to be re-lit every so many minutes? Decorative candles seem to be a major source of household fires and I'll bet that there are many, many more homes with candles than homes with cigarettes.
10 posted on 06/05/2006 1:13:23 PM PDT by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
in absence of a federal cigarette safety law.

This is a bit more ominous. Right up ATF's alley too.

11 posted on 06/05/2006 1:15:25 PM PDT by beltfed308 (Nanny Staters are Ameba's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Been done. The RJR "Premiere," which helped destroy the company after it spent $400 million on these duds. In the words of the former RJR president, "Tastes like shit; smells like a fart." The basis for "Barbarians at the Gate."


12 posted on 06/05/2006 1:20:27 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap
Why not require candles to be re-lit every so many minutes?

I despise those stinky paraffin-based candles. We need a law banning stinky substances.

13 posted on 06/05/2006 1:20:32 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Like joggers and mountain bikers in coffee shops. Yuck!
Not to mention oat bran muffin farts! Gad!


14 posted on 06/05/2006 1:23:32 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Join me! Every night I pray for Global Warming . (And I think it's beginning to work.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Puppage

16 posted on 06/05/2006 1:24:53 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Malden Fire Dept. Deputy Jack Colangeli told our Kiwanis Club that when he joined the force 25 years ago Smoking in Bed was the nmber one cause of death in fires. 25 years later. It still is.


17 posted on 06/05/2006 1:24:55 PM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NaughtiusMaximus
Like joggers and mountain bikers in coffee shops. Yuck!

Not to mention oat bran muffin farts! Gad!

It sounds as if you want to ban the City of Seattle.

18 posted on 06/05/2006 1:25:24 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Build the fence. Sí, Se Puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Is this the same state that bans you from pumping gas into your car?


19 posted on 06/05/2006 1:30:35 PM PDT by battlecry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

why do cigars and cigarettes smell different? The chemicals in ciggies?


20 posted on 06/05/2006 1:31:25 PM PDT by llevrok (The next greatest generation is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson