Replies

To: ahayes; trisham; Tribune7

You're not a scientist, sweetie.
From what I've read about her coverage of the topic, that comes through pretty clearly.
Here is a word to the wise:

Ann bashing (re: evolution) is NOT a good idea on this forum. ;)

See also Tribune7's creation/evolution mega-thread, which the Admin Moderator finally locked -- after 961 replies:

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.

Locked on 04/29/2006 1:50:06 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

Enough noise from this damn thing.

Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter weighs in on Darwinism
uncommondescent.com ^ | William Dembski

Posted on 04/27/2006 8:01:57 AM PDT by Tribune7

I’m happy to report that I was in constant correspondence with Ann regarding her chapters on Darwinism — indeed, I take all responsibility for any errors in those chapters. :-)

(Excerpt) Read more at uncommondescent.com ...
CLICK HERE for the rest of this "read only" thread

16 posted on 06/05/2006 12:08:37 PM PDT by RonDog

Thanks, but I was being sarcastic. I'm kind of a Coulter-bot.

17 posted on 06/05/2006 12:13:03 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)

Oh God forbid we disagree with Ann Coulter.

18 posted on 06/05/2006 12:22:41 PM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)

(And that thread was locked for the nonsense equating evolutionists with Nazis, by the way.)

19 posted on 06/05/2006 12:25:14 PM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)

It sounds like she is on the money again.

21 posted on 06/06/2006 6:39:50 AM PDT by Tribune7

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794