Search engines don't read articles, PEOPLE read...Oh, never mind. I can see I'm totally wasting my breath.
Google position is determined by some super secret algorithm that includes and is directly related to the number and quality of eyeballs viewing the web page.
A high-traffic web page read by all the Google elites will necessarily achieve a most excellent Google position. While the converse is not necessarily true, i.e., it is theoretically possible to achieve a high position and not be read, such a result is, in my view, highly unlikely.
I don't believe threads that are unreadable can consistently achieve a Google position in the top ten.
Is it your position that a thread that is 'unreadable' can--in the real world--achieve position:
- 1/ 8,030,000 gets? (keywords 'hillary' and 'nuclear')
- Or 4/3,570,000? (keywords 'clinton ignored terrorism')
- Or 2/8,060,000? (keywords 'clinton' and 'united 93')
- Or 7 and 10/3,210,000? (keywords 'hillary' and 'rape')
- Or 6/3,470,000? (keywords 'hillary fraud')
- Or 7/2,220,000? (keywords 'hillary' and 'racism')
- Or 1,2,6 and 7/7,550,000 (keywords 'kill 'em tomorrow')
- Or 1 and 2/5,630,000 (keywords 'miss hillary')
- Or 1, 2, 4 and 8/152,000 (keywords 'clinton albright nobel')
- Or 1, 2 and 3/182,000 (keywords 'deconstructing clinton')
- Or 2/328,000 (keywords 'dysfunctional presidency')
I've looked at a number of your posts over the years, and honestly, once I clicked through to the page I doubt I've ever read one. I MIGHT have read the first one. Now I just see, "Oh, there's that unreadable mess again."
I clicked this one because it had a good headline. That's all.