Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlazingArizona
"What libertarians want to do, however, is change our legal system to get government totally out of the marriage business. If marriage had no effect on inheritance, tax rates, welfare eligibility, or child custody, there would be no incentive for any pressure group to finagle the system for its own advantage. Marriage would be "owned" by churches, not by governments."

I see, so everyone buy their own insurance, even wives and children would need to buy a separate health ins. policy.

That would work great./sarc.
49 posted on 06/04/2006 7:15:52 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Juan Williams....The DNC's "Crash test Dummy" for talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U
I see, so everyone buy their own insurance, even wives and children would need to buy a separate health ins. policy.

Assuming that every private. non-regulation-coerced insurance company were to set up their policies this way, how is this less fair than our current system, in which a married couple with no kids pays the same "family" rate as a family of eight with all the usual ear infections and braces?

74 posted on 06/04/2006 8:13:11 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson