You debate like a dem....you hypothesize and when you are questioned about something you said, you parse the words to make them fit into your theory..
How clever..
"You debate like a dem....you hypothesize and when you are questioned about something you said, you parse the words to make them fit into your theory..
How clever.."
Shall we not argue about the argument and stick with the discussion at hand? I remain open to any specific argument you may have relevant to the topic of the thread.
Now, that is a comment that interests me. "You debate like a dem....you hypothesize and when you are questioned about something you said, you parse the words to make them fit into your theory.." I have noticed that liberals do tend to argue hypotheticals and dismiss facts as inconsequential anecdotal evidence. As a historian who builds on anecdotal evidence, exclusively, this drives me nuts.