Some of the articles I read could offer other reasons.
The way the law is written, many people who already send their kids to preschool (and can afford it) would be covered in this plan. As such, many of the super-liberals oppose it because they think it should be more of a welfare program for the poor.
On the right side of the aisle, you see opposition for many reasons:
- Oppose state funding for more social programs
- See it as an opportunity for Reiner-like-minds to get access to children earlier
- See the requirement for credentialing of pre-school educators as unnecessary and destructive to many private institutions in operation today
- etc.
So why do 27% of conservatives support it? I offered my hypothesis. What's yours?