Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema

At the core, this really isn't a religious argument. The basic question is whether or not the people have the right, through their elected legislators, to define and set parameters by which the society will function--in this instance marriage being between one man and one woman. The people have consistently and overwhelmingly spoken on this, only to be ignored by tyrants wearing black robes.

The question is whether or not we really have a representative republic.


5 posted on 06/03/2006 10:20:44 AM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!!--Keep your "compassion" away from my wallet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog
The question is whether or not we really have a representative republic

In our representative republic marriage is decided by the states, not the federal government. A marriage amendment to the Constitution erodes the right of self determination of the states and increases dictatorial powers of the federal government.
.
21 posted on 06/03/2006 11:14:56 AM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson