Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kellynla

Doesn't matter. Once the story is out, regardless of the factual basis of it, it takes on a life of its own. I'm sure liberals are ecstatic about this. If this is ever shown to be false, it will handled by the MSM like the NYTimes retractions buried in the paper a few weeks later. Leave the original story in the minds of the public, but don't confront anyone with the truth, unless the truth happens to conform to the original story of course.


5 posted on 06/02/2006 9:16:59 AM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nosofar
If this is ever shown to be false...

Ah yes, I remember the old days when things like this had to be proven to be true.

6 posted on 06/02/2006 9:19:01 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: All
Timeline from the source article:

March 3: A preliminary report is completed and recommends further investigation.

March 9: Gen. Chiarelli receives that report and directs further review. That review is ongoing.

March 10: Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, are notified of the case.

March 11: President Bush is told of the case by National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley.


Imagine that. Handled just like I would expect it should be handled. The President was not out of the loop as many around here accused or implied yesterday.
7 posted on 06/02/2006 9:21:25 AM PDT by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson