I'm sorry, did the Censure Carter Committee do something to jeopardize their credibility? Since I work with them I was interested to know what's "out there" in terms of information that would make someone believe we were untrustworthy.
Please let me know so I can alert the rest of our team so as to address any concerns people might have.
Since the committee is led by Melanie Morgan of Move America Forward who has been in broadcast news for 20+ years including reporting from Beirut after the Marine barracks bombing, in Tianamen Square during the student uprising, and in Iraq to interview hundreds of soldiers as part of the "Voices of Soldiers" Truth Tour (for which she won the AP's Mark Twain Journalism Award) I don't know why someone would make a comment like you made in your post?
Again, unless my head is in the sand and there's some malicious story about the lies and deceptions at the Censure Carter Committee.
Please let me know!
I am not saying they did ANYTHING wrong at all. However, they are an advocacy group. By that fact alone, their assertions are suspect and would not be suitable for republication.
Please note: this is not an attack against them at all. I am sure they are correct in their investigation. But, let's say I was to hypothetically post their press release ('scuse me, article in WND) to a site that had both lib and conservative participants. I would be very correctly skewered...unless there was documentation that I could post or link that substantiated the claims.
That's why I say, show some source documentation. Don't just give me conclusions. Because then I have some evidence that I can use to back up the conclusion drawn.
The claims against Kerry's Vietnam performance raised by the Swiftees were just that: claims. But when the objective documentation rolled out that proved they were right, those claims turned into factual conclusions.
I'd love to see the same scenario happen against good ol' boy Jimmuh.