Replies

Marine Corps officials, he said on the same television program, have told him that troops shot one woman "in cold blood" who was bending over her child begging for mercy.

Let's parse this sentence, like we had to do everything that came out of Bubba's piehole during the years of the Clinton stain.

First "Marine Corps officials" is not the same thing as "Marine Corps officers". Could these be left-behind clintonoids with GSA ratings that make them untouchable? Are they even remotely involved with the case?

Second, even assuming the statement is true, why are they providing damning statements that the defense will rightly use to claim the inability for the accused to receive a fair trial. Even worse, under UCMJ, the defense can claim "command influence", which results in a case being dismissed, if true.

Third, Mu'tha (as he was called in another thread) is either passing on lies, or is leaking confidential information, which he has no right to possess. In either case, it's not to help further the presumption of innocence of the Marines.

Finally, it smells like the persecution's (not "prosecution's") side of the case is beginning to fall apart. This is beginning to look like another crude attempt to punish innocent people, like Hillary's handling of the White House travel office.