If a writer at the NYT had said, in 1944, that every rape by a GI in Europe was FDR's direct fault...that the war was caused by FDR...that FDR and the Congress were every bit as bad as Hitler was said to be and was an enemy of the American people...and that the Axis never hurt anybody and we had no business fighting them, would that be sedition? What would have happened to that gent? I don't see how it's any different from PCR's points here.
PCR says the Commnder-in-Chief is a terrorist, and that we have become a terror sponsoring state. Do you agree or disagree with that?
If your premise is correct - Mr. Roberts would be in custody today - or possibly in the near future. As I asked, please ping me when the charges are filed.
PCR says the Commnder-in-Chief is a terrorist, and that we have become a terror sponsoring state. Do you agree or disagree with that?
I think to refer to bush as a terrorist is quite a stretch, and I think everyone is welcome to their opinion. let's consider each of the writer's assertions individually and determine their accuracy.