To: stands2reason
Do scientists have a theory on what spurred the Cambrian explostion? Pre-Cambrian life was unicellular. There was no need for an extinction event as the ecological niches were unfilled.
Here's a link you might like Eons of Earth Geological History
Cmabrian explosion
I normally do not care for Wikipedia but it seems to be fairly accurate on the pure sciences.
82 posted on
06/01/2006 6:16:39 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(The social contract is breaking down.)
To: Centurion2000; stands2reason
S2R: Do scientists have a theory on what spurred the Cambrian explostion?C2k: Pre-Cambrian life was unicellular
Not all of it. Wiki article
This article has nice pictures.
To: Centurion2000
From that, what is earliest accepted time of:
First uni-celluar life?
First "thing" that could be considered a "plant"? (Those are the limestone rock columns off of Australia, aren't they?)
Solidification of the earth from interstellar rubble into what we'd recognize as the original stable continents? (Canada shield is oldest rock still around, right?)
Collision that created the moon?
136 posted on
06/02/2006 6:30:46 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson