Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

First of all, PROVE that was a human and not some type of extinct ape.


32 posted on 06/01/2006 2:01:59 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Echo Talon

It's not an ape as it falls far closer to human features than any modern ape. The shape of the skull and the teeth are far more human like than modern apelike. the cranium capacity is much larger too. Also it walked upright.


39 posted on 06/01/2006 2:14:17 PM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Echo Talon
First of all, PROVE that was a human and not some type of extinct ape.

First of all, PROVE that the Biblical account of creation is more accurate than the Hindu one.

83 posted on 06/01/2006 3:13:55 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (Karen Ryan reporting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Echo Talon
First of all, PROVE that was a human and not some type of extinct ape.

It's neither human nor ape. It's in between. It's got characteristics of both. That makes it, *gasp*, a transitional fossil!

Compare it to an ape and human skull and see for yourself.

253 posted on 06/02/2006 3:41:24 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson