Replies

"Show one rude post by Coyoteman or take back your assertion."

Let Me! Let Me! Let Me! WHAT FUN!!!

Let's examine every post Coyoteman has made in this thread to see if it's rude or not.

Post #7, RUDE, Implies ICR is not trustworthy. Slanders their goals.
Post #8, RUDE Uses the total number of fossils to try to imply that they are all supportive of evolution when in fact only a very small percentage are. Then using this overstated info, rudely and haughtily dimisses Echo with "So much for your 'couple of bones' contention".
Post #56, RUDE accuses Echo of "blowing smoke" and being a "troll"
Post #69, RUDE implies Echo is stupid for not trusting the so-called experts like Coyoteman. "You might not be able to, but we can"
Post #75 RUDE insults Echo's education while completely ignoring Echo's point about imaginary species.
Post #88 NO RUDENESS!
Post #106 No Rudeness, but he does post a chart that has known problems that have been pointed out to him in the past without acknowledgint those problems.
Post 112 No Rudeness!
Post 117 RUDE Accuses Creationists of frequently misrepresenting science. Also accuses Creationists of attacking science itself instead of certain evolutionist methods and/or conclusions, thereby implying Creationists are anti-science when they are not.
Post 127 RUDE Posts California Indian creation story implying all cultures, religions and creation stories are equal. This is Coyoteman's trademark rude posts.
Post 129 RUDE Posts another Indiean Creation story implying all cultures, religions and creation stories are equal.
Post 131 No Rudeness
Post 135, RUDE last line insults Elders.
Post 143, No Rudeness, jokingly claims to be always nice.
Post 159, No Rudeness, even offers an apology for allegedly calling DaveLoneRanger an A**hole.
Post 167, RUDE says F.J. Mitchell doesn't know anything about his posting history and style.
Post 172, NO RUDENESS Does admit to biting sarcasm and appears to successfully defend against DaveLoneRanger's allegation. Again offers apology.
Post 175, No Rudeness
Post 179, No Rudeness, but is still appears to be overstating the Number of fossils that are actually relevant to evolution.

Summary

Of Coyote's 19 posts, 10 were deemed rude, 9 were not.
However there were two apologies to an as yet unsubstantiated allegation of vulgar name calling, which of itself is a noteworthy positive.