[cogitator]

You might find this interesting.

[Dominic Harr]

I do find this interesting, but mainly cuz in it they keep pointing out how wrong all the models are. But it's interesting how that apparently never once causes them to reconsider their basic assumptions!!!

Do I need to detail for you the contradictions in this article? Or will you just stipulate that something is out of whack with that?

They have a correlation -- in this one instance, something might have caused methane ice trapped at the bottom of the sea to flood the atmosphere with Co2.

Now, did that Co2 cause the temp increase? Or, did whatever massive geologic event it was cause the temp increase, and the Co2 release was a by-product?

Suppose a long string of comets/space debris hit, and released the ice, and caused fires across the globe, and massive tectonic upheavals that created heat? I can imagine a thousand possible explanations for what happened.

They just don't know yet. Clearly their models -- the ones you folks so dearly rely on, are not even close to accurate.

This is just one more nail in the coffin for ya'll, it appears. It goes on and on about how bad the models are.