Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spinestein

I agree both mother and father should be accountable for their offspring's welfare.

And I think that marriage is best apprehended as not merely a contractual obligation, but a sacrament. But there are legitimate reasons for government to support and accord special status/recognition to it.

It used to be that tolerance in the country meant toleration of things that would never be held as equivalent, equal or prefered practices. Tolerated meant "not criminalized."

Now we're expected to obliterate instititutions and social mores that have proven themselves over the course of long history--and for what?

Nothing as good. That's certain.


88 posted on 06/01/2006 4:06:39 PM PDT by olderwiser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: olderwiser

[...there are legitimate reasons for government to support and accord special status/recognition to it [marriage].]


I strongly agree with you on that statement, but if you were pressed to support your opinion for the record, could you list them and even briefly summarize those reasons?


89 posted on 06/01/2006 4:19:06 PM PDT by spinestein (The Democratic Party is the reason I vote for Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson