[tpaine]

Let's try this. The cops have a valid, constituional warrant to search your house for child porn. They enter your home and see two homosexuals engaging in anal sex right there on your couch.
Under our current laws, the two homosexuals cannot be arrested and charged with sodomy because they're protected under the right of privacy. Are we in synch so far? (No, I don't know their names or their phone numbers).

[I'm sure mojave does, - but go on.]

When the cops enter, they also see two people in the kitchen smoking marijuana. Another two are gambling. Another two are engaging in prostitution. They arrest those six.

They can't, constitutionally speaking. Same privacy protection applies as to mojaves friends.

I'm asking you, why doesn't the constitutional right to privacy extend to those six? Please answer my question.

It does extend, but States ignore such protections if the higher courts 'look the other way'. -- Everyone knows this, but prohibitionists & their straight [ahem] 'men' prefer to imagine that they don't.

Don't wait for a straight (ahem) answer. 326 -mojave-

[robertpaulsen]

"They can't, constitutionally speaking."

What? Of course they can. It's done all the time.

[MACVSOG68]

TP, you have the patience of Job! As another web site has so eloquently put it: I can teach it to you, but I can't understand it for you....

These clowns have no interest in either learning or in even defending their position in anything resembling a coherent manner. One of the idiots keeps trying to get me banned for defending the Constitution. Fortunately visitors may pick up on some tips so it may not be totally wasted. Hang in there.