Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
"You must answer the question of why private homosexual behavior (which has been done throughout history) is any more destructive to society than private heterosexual behavior."

I was told long ago to not even try to explain morality to someone who doesn't want to listen. If you can't see how homosexual behavior is immoral, debasing and destructive to our society, then I'm not the one to explain it to you.

"You have done no more than single out homosexual males while ignoring homosexual females and heterosexuals for doing exactly the same thing."

Quit acting like a child. What's your next question -- why is sex with a 17-year-old legal but not one who is 16 1/2? Why is 55MPH legal but not 56MPH? Huh? Huh? Huh??

Certain behaviors are not acceptable to our society. Homosexual sodomy is one. You may get some court to accept it, but that's a hollow victory and you know it.

297 posted on 06/04/2006 10:27:38 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
I was told long ago to not even try to explain morality to someone who doesn't want to listen. If you can't see how homosexual behavior is immoral, debasing and destructive to our society, then I'm not the one to explain it to you.

That is not the issue. Again as you accused me of, you are weaseling. Morality is a difficult thing to legislate. I asked you to draft a law that prohibits male sodomy yet does not violate the constitutional rights of that group. I would think you could do it in a few sentences. You can explain how after 100 thousand years of homosexual conduct, we are in great danger today because, although their numbers have not grown and they are still less than 2 percent of the population, what they do in the privacy of their own homes poses a great danger to this Republic.

Quit acting like a child. What's your next question -- why is sex with a 17-year-old legal but not one who is 16 1/2? Why is 55MPH legal but not 56MPH? Huh? Huh? Huh??

Child? Don't leave yourself open like that....

Sex with a 17 year old is illegal for everyone unless she is married in those states permitting such marriages. She is considered not to have the capacity to make an adult decision and is therefore at a disadvantage. No court would rule otherwise. But the law doesn't care whether the perp is gay or straight. Do you see the difference? It's called equal protection of the law. As for your silly speeding analogy, if certain classes of people were not allowed to go 56 mph, but others were, then you have a constitutional issue requiring the state to explain. But since everyone is required to obey the speed laws, there is no violation. And that wisdom from a child.....

Certain behaviors are not acceptable to our society. Homosexual sodomy is one. You may get some court to accept it, but that's a hollow victory and you know it.

Oh, I don't know. As I asked before, are you even aware of such laws? If not, then apparently society has either awaken to the Constitution, or is not as homophobic as some here....or both.

303 posted on 06/04/2006 10:57:18 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson