Laws against bestiality generally recognize that an animal cannot be a consenting adult. No matter what you personally thing of homosexual behavior morally, if it involves consenting adults there is a substantial distinction there from bestiality.
Plus, your perverts posing as patriots are engaged in an activity that is a primary vector for the transmission of various horrific deseases.
I agree but then all unprotected sex no matter what the gender or genders is in the same category. But if that's the case, I'm sure that you would then support those efforts of gays and lesbians to engage in monogamous relationships and use protections. Oh, as for the health dangers, including AIDS, Syphilus, Chlamidia, Gonorrhea, male homosexuals were the recipient of less than 1.5 percent according to statistics.
As for the morality of male to male sexual relations, since most heterosexuals engage in exactily the same acts, should those be addressed also? What about lesbians? How should the laws address them?
You actually needed that explained to you?
Yeah, I'm looking to all the experts here to educate me. I do appreciate you taking the time.
Says who?
all unprotected sex no matter what the gender or genders is in the same category.
Source please.