Suppose these bullet holes in the Iraqi *victims* were effected sometime after the firefight, like, say around the time a reporter working for a faux news company known to collaborate with the terrorists came knocking with a plan to make these people some blood money?
Why else would they be undisclosed by the military investigation, then show up months later?
Excellent supposition.
You are correct - There are plenty of things popping out regarding the events in Haditha that simply to make much sense - Or give everyone reason for pause and the clear reason for giving our guys the benefit of the doubt.
Without question -
And people need to understand just because JAGs continue to want to bring a case means absolute nothing! - JAGs at times simply want to *win* once they've convinced themselves of this or that - Time and again soldiers are fully acquitted of over zealous chargers by JAGs -
All the evidence is not out regarding this specific case in Haditha - And it seems clear some very important evidence will likely never be available (the bodies for example - I was told the families have refused having the unburied and re-examied) - Yet doctor who did the original examination had a clear axe to grind (as he was arrested and held for possible pro-insurgent connections) before this all happened in Haditha.
We have a daughter of one of these family members clearly saying she (and her family) were aware of the IED and when it was going to go off - Giving reason again for pause that perhaps her family was actively supporting those blowing this IED.
There is just a tremendous amount not fully known....yet we watch our MSM trying and already convict these men simply to try and continue to run down this war (and our successes).