[LibertarianInExile]

blah blah blah Non-Sequitur claims to read "Constitution," and ignores article showing how that provision is routinely ignored just as Libertarianinexile said, Non-Sequitur posts snide comment about it nonetheless...

And if YOU read the article above, you might note that these states ARE entering into a compact, and Congress isn't involved. Oh, no, it's unConstitutional! So is the notion of excluding jury rights in suits at common law where the value in controversy is over twenty dollars, but then, you'd never know that from the U.S. Supreme Court, either. Thank goodness we have you around to kiss their 'interpreting-a-living-document-might-makes-right' fannies.

[Non-Sequitur]

And if YOU read the article above, you might note that these states ARE entering into a compact, and Congress isn't involved.

Actually I did read it. Especially the part where the idea has been proposed. Not enacted, not voted on, just proposed. And if they try to place their proposal into action, especially where other states are involved, then they'll need Congressional approval before it can be enacted. Just like the Constitution says. Or hadn't you made it that far?