Skip to comments.
California devises end-run around electoral college (Passed!)
CoCoTimes ^
| 5/28/06
| Jim Sanders
Posted on 05/31/2006 3:09:09 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-293 next last
To: groanup; All
...And God Created California!
In the Beginning....
God was missing for six days. Eventually, Michael the archangel found him, resting on the seventh day. He inquired of God. "Where have you been?"
God sighed a deep sigh of satisfaction and proudly pointed downwards through the clouds, "Look, Michael. Look what I've made."
Archangel Michael looked puzzled and said, "What is it?"
"It's a planet," replied God, "and I've put Life on it. I'm going to call it Earth and it's going to be a great place of balance."
"Balance?" Inquired Michael, still confused.
God explained, pointing to different parts of earth. "For example, northern Europe will be a place of great opportunity and wealth while southern Europe is going to be poor. Over there I've placed a continent of white people and over there is a continent of black people,"
God continued pointing to different countries. "This one will be extremely hot and while this one will be very cold and covered in ice."
The Archangel, impressed by God's work, then pointed to a land mass and said "What's that one?"
"Ah," said God. "That's California the most glorious place on earth. There are beautiful beaches, deserts, streams, hills, and forests. The people from California are going to be handsome, modest, intelligent and humorous and they are going to be found traveling the world. They will be extremely sociable, hardworking and high achieving, and they will be known throughout the world as diplomats and carriers of peace."
Michael gasped in wonder and admiration but then proclaimed, "What about balance, God? You said there would be balance!!!"
God replied wisely, "Wait until you see the idiots I put in Sacramento."
41
posted on
05/31/2006 3:33:53 PM PDT
by
musicman
To: groanup
If you ever have a need to find a stupid poitician one place to start looking is the California legislature.I don't think I'd have to travel that far to find one.
42
posted on
05/31/2006 3:35:32 PM PDT
by
Zero Sum
(Marxism is the opiate of the masses.)
To: BurbankKarl
Funny how leftists are all for
democracy mob rule, until the mob votes for something they don't approve of. Then it's off to the courts to make sure the masses get what the leftists decide they need...
Mark
43
posted on
05/31/2006 3:35:35 PM PDT
by
MarkL
(When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
To: BurbankKarl
The linchpin is a proposed "interstate compact..." I think the last time their was such an interstate compact designed to get around the pesky Constitution it was called The Confederacy.
44
posted on
05/31/2006 3:36:09 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: BurbankKarl
Assemblyman Tom Umberg, a Santa Ana Democrat who chairs the Assembly Election and Redistricting Committee, said the basic premise is understandable even to children Of course the concept of the electoral college is a little more complicated, thus children coming up through the ca public school system and democrats will have a hard time comprehending it
45
posted on
05/31/2006 3:36:13 PM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
Doesn't the Electoral College system help ensure that the President represents the whole country? If the voters in a few heavily populated states could determine the outcome (because they would determine the popular vote) wouldn't Presidential candidates pander to urbanized areas and ignore rural states? Yes. The Electoral College discourages regional candidates in several ways. It also moderates the effect of a regional disaster (like a hurricane suppressing votes in the east or south), and limits the effects of vote fraud (massive fraud in Florida doesn't directly affect Georgia).
46
posted on
05/31/2006 3:36:36 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: ThePythonicCow
They are so stupid (and ignorant of the Constitution) that they are even going so far as to call it "an interstate compact"! They aren't even using some weasel words to make people think it's not an unconstitutional compact among states.
47
posted on
05/31/2006 3:36:43 PM PDT
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: BurbankKarl
Well, f-ck, why not just dissolve all of the states and have one central Politburo running the entire nation. That's worked well before.
48
posted on
05/31/2006 3:38:40 PM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
If the voters in a few heavily populated states could determine the outcome (because they would determine the popular vote) wouldn't Presidential candidates pander to urbanized areas and ignore rural states?
You mean blue cities and red states?
Exactly.
49
posted on
05/31/2006 3:38:42 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: FreedomCalls
50
posted on
05/31/2006 3:41:13 PM PDT
by
ThePythonicCow
(We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
To: BurbankKarl
A proposal to reward states that allow vote fraud with more political power.
From the real party of corruption, of coarse.
51
posted on
05/31/2006 3:41:20 PM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: BurbankKarl
This is bullshit. When we vote for President, we are actually voting for the electors. The electors are reliable, political people who cast their votes per who elected them - Dem or Rep.
Compact? - me arse!
52
posted on
05/31/2006 3:41:59 PM PDT
by
don-o
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
This move would actually benefit the GOP far more than the Democrats. It effectively puts California into play with a high probability of going red, whereas right now it's a sure-bet blue state The frist time that the GOP wins an election with this, it's a sure bet that it will be quietly rescinded the next sessions by the dems.
53
posted on
05/31/2006 3:42:31 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(The social contract is breaking down.)
To: Mark was here
It's a crap proposal, a crap idea, and not enforceable. The idea of this is akin to throwing fuel on fire. It could lead to serious disruptions.
To: dfwgator
So what happens when the nationwide popular vote is only separated by a few thousand votes, then you have to recount every single ballot in the whole county, as opposed to only recounting the ballots in one state. Why then the most corrupt state finds enough votes for the candidate they like. Being pro-corruption, the Democrats favor such a system. They don't like photo IDs either.
55
posted on
05/31/2006 3:43:54 PM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
To: BurbankKarl
No, 3/4ths of the states need to approve Amendments to the US Constitution. In short, it'd never pass.
56
posted on
05/31/2006 3:43:54 PM PDT
by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: BurbankKarl
"Assemblyman Tom Umberg, a Santa Ana Democrat who chairs the Assembly Election and Redistricting Committee, said the basic premise is understandable even to children. "When you're in first grade, if the person who got the second-most votes became class leader, the kids would recognize that this is not a fair system," he said."
What an idiot. James Madison explained this very well in Federalist Paper #11. It's all about avoiding the tyranny of faction. Most kids learn this in High School but this guy must have gone to public school in California.
57
posted on
05/31/2006 3:44:20 PM PDT
by
joebuck
To: BurbankKarl
Are interstate compacts like this constitutional?
58
posted on
05/31/2006 3:45:17 PM PDT
by
NinoFan
To: Publius6961
Secondly, first-grade classes do not consist of free independent states agreeing to join a Republic, a concept that takes a little more sophistication to understand than can be found in the first grade. Oh, were that still so. See ya on the WONA threads.
Yet as long as that idea is still out there, "Keep Hope Alive!"
59
posted on
05/31/2006 3:46:00 PM PDT
by
don-o
To: dfwgator
How many Texans stayed home because they knew Bush would take the state, that otherwise would have voted for him, had it been a popular vote?And how many folks in the heavily republican Florida pan handle didn't vote when the state was called for Gore before the polls closed there?
60
posted on
05/31/2006 3:46:17 PM PDT
by
AndyTheBear
(Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-293 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson