Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GI'S BIG FAT SUIT VS. MOORE (Michael)
NEW YORK POST ^ | May 31, 2006 | JENNIFER FERMINO

Posted on 05/31/2006 10:07:07 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Peter J. Huss
You have to husband that emotion and spend it carefully.

Awesome quote...and oh so true. Everyday you see the hate and anger from the left and you have to wonder what kind of miserable life they must lead.

21 posted on 05/31/2006 10:54:45 AM PDT by PLOM...NOT! (Checking in from Wisconsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

He did include NBC

"NBC is named in the suit - which was filed in Suffolk County, Mass., on Friday - along with Harvey and Robert Weinstein, Miramax Corp., Lions Gate Films and other production companies involved with the picture."


22 posted on 05/31/2006 10:54:46 AM PDT by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kenth

lol. good luck to this vet.


23 posted on 05/31/2006 11:32:02 AM PDT by Landry Fan (Irey for Congress. Murtha is a rat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It shouldn't matter who the parties are in this suit. Using someone in a film without their promission is a crime.


24 posted on 05/31/2006 11:36:11 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

25 posted on 05/31/2006 11:44:29 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter J. Huss
You have to husband that emotion and spend it carefully... Hitler. Bin Laden. Stalin.

I agree.

But without the Moore's of the world, the others might not have made it to power. Moore is an enabler. Joseph Geobells was Hitler's right hand man, and just as guilty as Hitler, though he neverr issued a single order to have anyone killed. But he helped create the conditions that allowed those orders to be carried out.

The lacky's and toadies are as guilty as those they serve and enable. IMHO.

26 posted on 05/31/2006 12:44:03 PM PDT by PsyOp (The commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms.... - Aristotle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That's how Micheal Moore made all of F9/11. He hacks out quotes and plays hanky panky with the editing. The Coast Guard officer on Oregon is not happy with Moore either and the AP, who gave Michael Moore the clip of video of the now famous "My Pet Goat" episode claim that the entire thing was only 4 and a half minutes, not 7 minutes as Moore made everyone believe. Even the 9/11 Report says 4 1/2 minutes to 7 minutes because it is disputed between Moore and the AP.

And the famous Condi quote that Moore hacked.

In "Fahrenheit 9/11," Michael Moore truncated a comment by Condi Rice in order to deliberately give viewers of his movie the false impression that Bush said Saddam did 9/11. Here's the quote as it appeared in the film:

"There is a tie between Iraq and what happened on 9/11"

Now here's the full Condi quote:

"Oh, indeed there is a tie between Iraq and what happened on 9/11. It’s not that Saddam Hussein was somehow himself and his regime involved in 9/11, but, if you think about what caused 9/11, it is the rise of ideologies of hatred that lead people to drive airplanes into buildings in New York."

And Moore saying that the Afganistan War was not to root out the Taliban but rather was to build a pipeline by Haliburton for UNOCAL (He even showed the pipeline being built). FYI: UNOCAL dropped all bids to build a pipeline in 1998. And in 1998 that is when the Taliban vitisted the USA under the Clinton Admin with entry granted by the State Dept under the Clinton Admin. But Moore tried to pawn that off as the Taliban meeting with Bush who was governor at the time and Bush was not involved with that meeting whatsoever.

There is more junk I could discuss but the guy is too sickening to discuss at length.

Mikey does do good editing for the liberals and knows how to get money out of their wallets.

27 posted on 05/31/2006 12:47:15 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

And the MSM is all over this one! /sarc

http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=%22Peter%20Damon%22%20%22Michael%20Moore%22&btnG=Google+Search&sa=N&tab=wn


28 posted on 05/31/2006 12:50:57 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

According to IMDB, the gross revenue for this POS movie was $222,446,320 Worldwide as of 23 January 2005. It seems to me that this is the amount that Sgt. Damon should be suing for.

Also, I hope this lawsuit will make ol' Oliver Stone-d think twice about some of the footage in his upcoming 9/11 mock-u-mentary. Seems he has named names of victims even though the family of those victims have begged him not to.


29 posted on 05/31/2006 12:54:26 PM PDT by ssaftler (Politically Correct isn't! Progressives aren't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It would have been appropriate if his new crockumentary was released against X-Men 3:


30 posted on 05/31/2006 2:31:08 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is to conservatism what Howard Dean is to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
I'm beginning to think excess and obesity are requirements for liberal males. Kennedy, Gore, Moore, Murtha; there's enough blubber on these gluttons to melt into a second national oil reserve.

And on the distaff side, there is Lynne Stewart (the lawyer for the blind sheik) convicted of helping terrorists to try to carry out their attacks against Americans. I'm beginning to think that self-hate is being transferred to hate America.

31 posted on 05/31/2006 7:17:57 PM PDT by DejaJude (Admiral Clark said, "Our mantra today is life, liberty and the pursuit of those who threaten it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
It shouldn't matter who the parties are in this suit. Using someone in a film without their promission is a crime.

I'm not a lawyer, but I do want to know what the law says about this. If you allow the media to film you for any purpose, does that mean that you are now public property and can be used or abused by anyone for any purpose?

32 posted on 05/31/2006 7:41:08 PM PDT by DejaJude (Admiral Clark said, "Our mantra today is life, liberty and the pursuit of those who threaten it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DrC


"TWO years....You heard it here first."

I'll take that bet. Put me down for $50 on 18 months.


33 posted on 05/31/2006 8:21:03 PM PDT by NavySon (The Republican Party: stamping out the REAL racists since 1860.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I hope he gets millions


34 posted on 06/01/2006 9:34:47 AM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Let's hope the patriotic vet bankrupts this overweight Joseph Goebels.


35 posted on 06/01/2006 9:45:49 AM PDT by cowboy_code ("There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

'portly peacenik'

hilarious


36 posted on 06/01/2006 9:55:27 AM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson