To: BlueStateDepression
>>I would like to ask if a child should be buckled in.
No.
>>Violation of their rights to force them to be buckled in?
No.
>>Government overstepping?
No.
We let adults do things that endanger their own health, but we don't let those responsible endanger the health of children.
208 posted on
05/31/2006 11:16:24 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: Beelzebubba
OK then so it is OK to require a 17 year old to wear a belt but not an 18 year old or older? Or is it 20 year olds we restrain and not 21 year olds?
Care to comment?
you not restrained while your kids are in the car? Protecting the children right?
I hope you have fun trying to justify your position being that is directly contradicts itself when age is injected.
Then I suppose you will have to admit that you define liberty by age. Good luck with that one HA HA HA HA.
To: Beelzebubba
289 posted on
05/31/2006 12:20:38 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson