Considering
A. scandal of wasted parish donations being used by priests for personal enrichment, for example in Florida,
and
B. the moving of priests who are homosexual predators around, within and outside of different dioceses in the US
It seems to me the woman has some legitimate questions.
Why wouldn't a parrish want to operate their finances in an open manner? Why wouldn't the information be available to their parishioners?
The days of a gullible segment of Faithful ought to be over, these types of questions are reasonable and should be the norm in every parrish..
It's not just parishioners who volunteer to teach children CCD who need to be fingerprinted as is happening in Arlington, full disclosure of the priest should also be a given.
Every Catholic parish that I've ever heard of has been more than willing to share its financial statements with someone who has a legitimate interest. The fact that this fruitcake wants to see the pastor's personnel file (this is kept at the diocese, by the bishop, and is not shared with ANYBODY, including other priests) tells me she's off the rails mentally. Catholic Churches do not make it a practice to tell a parishioner to go elsewhere; in fact, I've never heard it done.
There doesn't seem to be a mass suspicion in the parish that the pastor is misusing parish funds, or that would have been included in the article.
It appears that the woman is now going to join a Protestant Church, where she can harrass an entire board of deacons.