[steadfastconservative]

If this story is true, would the liberals consider these atrocities to be sufficient reason for the US to take military action against North Korea? I don't think so. They would cry "quagmire" and "unjust war" if the US did anything. After all, liberals don't think any cause is worth spilling American blood over.

[MHGinTN]

" ... liberals don't think any cause is worth spilling American blood over." Uh, liberals have ardently promoted the systematic slaughter of more than 40 million alive Americans in the womb, so your assertion is a bit off, even making the liberals sound as if they something over which they are 'principled'. The cause for which these Americans were so purposely offed was liberal empowerment, mostly empowerment of the democrap party.

[oyez]

Just remember if North Korea were liberated capitalism might break out over there. We can't have that.

[Paul Ross]

After all, liberals don't think any cause is worth spilling American blood over.

Yes. And in this case...we do have the factor of Red China acting as the "guardian angel" of Kim Il Jung. Hence their further aversion from facing reality.

[Wurlitzer]

"If this story is true, would the liberals consider these atrocities to be sufficient reason for the US to take military action against North Korea?"

The simple straight forward answer to your question is: What ever will generate more votes!,/b>