I read the ruling - it was great.
He made some stupid quibbles over a valid search warrant - what they called an extended driveway he felt should be called a seperate road. And he quibble over whether the road material allowed the tire marks to be tracked to the house in question.
The courts allowed the warrant over the defenses objection.
They said that they did not discipline him because of this memo - but they should have.
The courts ruled that even if they had disciplined him (by reassigingin him) over this memo it was okay and he could not sue them over it.
I AGREE.
Back that up. This whole thing was supposed to be about managerial DISCRETION. D-I-S-C-R-E-T-I-O-N.