Posted on 05/30/2006 9:58:06 AM PDT by floridaobserver
"I myself do not care to own slaves, but I do support letting people choose for themselves on the issue. I am merely pro-choice on the issue".
Thunderous applause.
"How long do you think it's going to be before California does the same thing?"
They're working on it. Governors like Reagan and Schwartzenegger slow them down now and then, and also all the conservative people in California, who care about America, their families and their God.
Hahahah and they were worried about what the muslim extremists did to a film director??? This ought to be interesting....
Being active in scouting I can tell you, Scouting events are like flames for these sickos... if they find out about em, they make every effort to infiltrate em. Have to have people on duty with no other purpose than to keep a watch on the perimeter to keep these sickos away...
One showed up last year at a CUB SCOUT day camp event.. hung out on the outskirts for 2 days and on the third day showed up wearing the same looking clothing as the counselors for the event... when cops were called, they knew who he was before they ever saw him.. had a long history.. but was still walking the streets.
I think its long overdue... it should be a capitol offense... at the very least 2nd offence LWOPP and let the prison population take care of the actual execution.
You're right -- can't legislate morality. Besides, those folks against slavery are soooooo judgmental. The cool people get nuance - they know complex issue don't have simple answers... Every slave owner must make his own call. (sarcasm off)
Must be the muslim influence behind this.
Michael Jackson was unavailable for comment (although the bigggest smile from ear to ear was seen on his face)....
You'd of thought it was Christmas morning or something...
You must mean "Libertine" because My knee-jerk comment is that I believe in common sense rule of law (like MOST lLibertarians)! Apparently you are an extremely extreme right-wing zealot, sitting at the right hand of Pat Robertson, because your ignorance of Libertarians is extremely stark.
These monsters should be hunted down like mad dogs.
I am DEFENDING Libertarians when I said, per post #3 --
Waiting for the obligatory knee-jerk Libertarian comment.
This statement merely means that:
On every child-porn or drug legalization thread, there is always an idiot FReeper or two who blames this on Libertarians, or "Liberal-tarians" as they call them, and my post #3 comment was a prediction that some FReeper will utter said remarks.
I'm a conservative-libertarian (I don't support the stupid LP national party though) who believes that the stereotype of Libertarians enjoying porn and being strung out on pot is a bunch of BS too.
OK, now take a deep breath, and chug down a cold one before you implode...
I agree, but what if the pedophile is short?
Sex Offender Ruled Too Short For Jail
5-Foot-1 Man Gets Probation Instead Of Prison, Sparking Debate
(AP) A judge's decision to sentence a 5-foot-1 man to probation instead of prison for sexually assaulting a child has angered crime victim advocates who say the punishment sends the wrong message.
But supporters of short people say it's about time someone recognizes the unique challenges they face.
Be a man and apologize, or at least concede you were in the wrong, if you're going to attack me like a lunatic.
>>>You obviously totally misrepresented my remarks.>>>
No, if I misread them, I apologize. But they pretty much represented themselves.
>>>Posts like these always invite the knee-jerk arguments that Libertarians support child-porn and free drugs.>>>
Yes, as I thought yours was doing. My apologies.
>>>I was, in fact, defending Libertarians, not criticizing them.>>>
Good. There are alot here who have been mislead to believing that Libertarian means anarchy or 'anything goes'. Which is completely incorrect.
>>>Be a man and apologize, or at least concede you were in the wrong, if you're going to attack me like a lunatic.>>>
Umm, first of all, I'm a woman.
Second, I just did, but after this post I'm reconsidering. YOU be a man and let right be right and wrong be wrong. Stop fretting at your computer waiting for an apology that might not have been forthcoming. Demanding an apology is wussified.
And I should know that how?
Second, I just did, but after this post I'm reconsidering.
I had no idea when you were going to respond.
Let's squash this and call it even. FReegards
Extremely,
Your initial posting was easy written in a way that was easy to misunderstand. Why are you making such a big deal about this????
Give it a rest.
It's cool, bro...
I admit I never thought the day would come when pedophiles would form a political party. I would dismiss such "crazy talk" from alarmists but there is it in black-and-white. Will the Dutch finally draw a line? And if now, how many years will it be before they finally concede and then, in another 100 years the same thing will come to America if it still exists.
I thought CA's "public safety committee" was bad with its overzealous protection of pedophiles and then I see this. If it gets on the talk radio circuit it should make for some great rants!
The Boy Scouts should have their public funding cut back if they fall afoul of a commmunity's standards. They argued for being a private organization and won at SCOTUS. They can't then beg for public funds out of one side of your mouth while the other says you're private and not subject to the kinds of conditions which come with accepting public tax dollars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.